lurkers

Most team members have responded so I will summarize and make recommendations.

  1. A majority approve of me adding Rita to our 2 mailing lists if there is no objection to the following.
    1. In response to Patricia's comment, I still need to add Rita to both lists because everyone is not on the TF list.
    2. I won't add anyone else until someone asks or you submit their names for discussion.
  2. "Read only": I can make both lists read only very easily.
    1. If I make the mi-ep list read only, someone needs to volunteer to receive emails from those who want a space at our yard sale. 
    2.  



 

I abstain.

Owen

 

From: Patricia Earnest

Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2013 12:11 AM

To: mi-ep@googlegroups.com

Subject: Re: "Lurkers" - mi-ep@googlegroups.com; miep-tf@googlegroups.com

 

I do have some thoughts on this matter, but am just back from Seattle & need some time to mull. What comes to mind initially is that since most TF mail also goes to mi-ep, is there any reason to add folks to both? Is JeffCo willing to be part of the TF,  or are they already, just by virtue of what they represent?

 

Janet's point is well taken... Is our process of interest or our decisions?  Wording this thought differently, might it be better to send most our "lurkers" a distillation or decision track, rather than our repeats? If someone, like Rita in this case, with many years of advantageous experience, is interested in being a "lurker," that is whom I'd agree to put on the "read only" list. 

 

We may find that we should have a "marine division" for Marty so that we also can "lurk" on his correspondence as well as he on ours. I think he should be on miep/marine.

 

I say Jeffco has no reason just to lurk on our matters. When information should be sent to that entity, it will be.

 

How does that sound? Hmmmm, Perhaps I've mulled enough...

 

Patricia

On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:35 PM, Pete Hubbard wrote:



I will only add a lurker to our 2 mailing lists if you approve.

 

Currently, neither list is “read only”. 

1.       We have invited anyone to post to the mi-ep@googlegroups.com list via this notice “Preregistration is required because space is limited.  Interested sellers should send an email to mi-ep@googlegroups.com  to reserve your space and/or to ask any questions.” In this web page - www.miep.us/home/annual-yard-sale

2.       We have invited anyone to post to the miep-tf@googlegroups.com list via this notice “(Post a msg to our mailing list with suggested changes/improvements. Pete)” in this web page www.miep.us/taskforce.

 

Pete

 

From: MIEP-TF@googlegroups.com [mailto:MIEP-TF@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of kurt steinbach
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 10:01 PM
To: mi-ep@googlegroups.com
Cc: miep-tf@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: "Lurkers" - mi-ep@googlegroups.com; miep-tf@googlegroups.com

 

Fine with me too.  However, I would not want to add many lurkers to our subscribers list.  I say this only that I do not want to add more voices of partial participants to our business conversations.  These lurkers should have “read only” access until they are fully integrated into the business of either MIEP or MIEP-TF, or both.

 

Kurt

 

From: Janet and/or Willi

Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 6:11 PM

To: mi-ep@googlegroups.com

Cc: miep-tf@googlegroups.com

Subject: Re: "Lurkers" - mi-ep@googlegroups.com; miep-tf@googlegroups.com

 

From my perspective being subjected to lots of emails doesn't sound like a way to get people to step in, but maybe some people like that sort of thing.  Please make sure they have an idea of the number of emails per month on average.  (a count of some of the miep letters in my inbox for May exceeded 50)

Janet

 

 

On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Zimmerman, Mike (PARKS) wrote:




Fine with me and sounds like a good way to break in.

 

Mike Zimmerman

Fort Flagler Area Manager

360-385-1259 (office)

360-301-1772 (cell)

mike.zimmerman@parks.wa.gov

 

From: MIEP-TF@googlegroups.com [mailto:MIEP-TF@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Pete Hubbard
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 10:56 AM
To: mi-ep@googlegroups.com; miep-tf@googlegroups.com
Subject: "Lurkers" - mi-ep@googlegroups.com; miep-tf@googlegroups.com

Lurker - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


"In Internet culture, a lurker is typically a member of an online community who observes, but does not actively participate. The exact definition depends on context. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lurker

Most of our 

 

I just talked with Rita Kepner about her interest in joining our MIEP Team. She said she may want to in the future.

 

I asked if she might be interested in being a “lurker” on our 2 mailing lists and she thought that would be a good idea. I said I would ask you if that was OK with you. Is it?

 

Might we want to invite others to lurk like Marty Loken, one of the DEM officers (http://www.jeffcoeoc.org/contacts.htm), ?

 

Pete

 

 

-- 
-- Msg. archives are at http://groups.google.com/group/MIEP-TF?hl=en?hl=en
Website is at https://sites.google.com/site/miemergencyprep/taskforce
 
 

 

-- 
-- 
---> ALL MIEP emails: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/mi-ep
 
 

 

-- 
-- 
---> ALL MIEP emails: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/mi-ep
 
 

-- 
-- Msg. archives are at http://groups.google.com/group/MIEP-TF?hl=en?hl=en
Website is at https://sites.google.com/site/miemergencyprep/taskforce
 
 

 

-- 
-- 
---> ALL MIEP emails: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/mi-ep
 
 

 

--
--
---> ALL MIEP emails: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/mi-ep
 
 

--
--
---> ALL MIEP emails: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/mi-ep
 
  

Comments